ThreatHunter76/Incident-Response-Analysis

GitHub: ThreatHunter76/Incident-Response-Analysis

一份基于 TryHackMe 实验平台的事件响应实战报告,完整记录了从异常进程发现到恶意宏文档感染媒介溯源的全过程调查分析。

Stars: 0 | Forks: 0

# 事件响应分析报告 ## 简介 本项目记录了在 TryHackMe Incident Response Process 实验室环境中进行的一次实战事件响应调查。该演练侧重于使用结构化的事件响应方法论,对受感染 Windows 工作站上的可疑活动进行识别、分析和调查。 调查涵盖: - 进程分析 - 网络分析 - 恶意软件调查 - 感染媒介识别 - 命令与控制 (C2) 通信分析 本次分析采用了源自 NIST 事件响应框架和 SANS 事件响应流程模型的概念。 # 目标 本项目的目标是模拟真实的安全事件,并应用实战事件响应技术来: - 检测可疑活动 - 调查恶意软件行为 - 分析恶意网络通信 - 识别感染媒介 - 了解攻击者技术与妥协指标 (IOC) # 事件场景 一名用户报告称,其在浏览互联网和处理文档时,Windows 笔记本电脑变得异常缓慢且不稳定。 IT 部门的初步调查显示: - CPU 占用率高 - 持续的对外网络连接 - 可疑的系统行为 - SIEM 或 EDR 解决方案未触发任何告警 该案例被升级上报给事件响应 (IR) 团队以进行进一步的取证调查。 # 调查过程 ## 1. 进程分析 使用 Windows 任务管理器,发现了一个名为以下名称的可疑进程: ``` 32th4ckm3 was identified consuming approximately 51.5% CPU resources. Suspicious Indicators * High CPU usage * Unusual process naming convention * Execution from Temp directory * Continuous outbound network communication ⸻ 2. File Location Investigation The malicious executable was found running from: C:\Users\TryCleanUser\AppData\Local\Temp This directory is commonly abused by malware due to its write permissions and low visibility. ⸻ 3. Network Analysis The Process ID (PID) was collected and investigated using: netstat -aofn | find "PID" Findings * Repeated outbound connections * Communication with an external IP address * Potential Command and Control (C2) activity This behavior strongly indicated malware beaconing activity. ⸻ 4. Infection Vector Identification Browser downloads and user activity were reviewed. A suspicious macro-enabled Word document was identified: invoiceN.37484567.docm ⸻ Malware Analysis The .docm file was analyzed using the Microsoft Word VBA Macro Editor. Suspicious VBA Functions Observed * GetObject * Winmgmts * ExecQuery These functions are commonly associated with: * WMI abuse * Malware execution * Remote command execution * System reconnaissance The document was confirmed to contain malicious macro code. ⸻ Key Findings Suspicious Process 32th4ckm3 Observed Behavior * Excessive CPU utilization * Persistent outbound connections * Unauthorized activity ⸻ Command & Control Communication Indicators of C2 activity included: * Continuous outbound traffic * Repeated communication with the same IP address * Unknown external communication ⸻ Infection Vector Malicious macro-enabled document: invoiceN.37484567.docm ⸻ Skills Demonstrated This project provided practical experience in: * Incident Response * Malware Triage * Process Investigation * Network Analysis * Threat Detection * Root Cause Analysis * Command & Control Detection * Windows Endpoint Investigation ⸻ Tools & Techniques Used * Windows Task Manager * Netstat * VBA Macro Editor * Process Analysis * Network Connection Analysis * IOC Investigation ⸻ Lessons Learned * Not all malicious activity triggers SIEM or EDR alerts * Behavioral analysis is critical during investigations * Temporary directories are common malware execution locations * Macro-enabled Office documents remain a major phishing vector * Network analysis is essential for identifying malicious communications ⸻ Frameworks Referenced NIST Incident Response Framework * Preparation * Detection and Analysis * Containment, Eradication, and Recovery * Post-Incident Activity SANS Incident Response Framework * Preparation * Identification * Containment * Eradication * Recovery * Lessons Learned ⸻ Conclusion This project successfully demonstrated the practical application of incident response methodologies within a controlled SOC lab environment. Through structured investigation techniques, the malicious process, suspicious network communications, and macro-enabled infection vector were successfully identified and analyzed. The exercise strengthened my understanding of: * Threat investigation * Malware behavior analysis * Endpoint monitoring * Incident escalation * Cybersecurity operations workflows ⸻ Author AbdulQudus Olamilekan AbdulHakeem Aspiring SOC Analyst | Threat Hunter | Cybersecurity Enthusiast ```
标签:DAST, 安全报告, 库, 应急响应, 恶意软件分析, 数字取证, 自动化脚本