zerodayhunter543/Defeating-Entropy-Smoothing-Advanced-Malware-Detection-with-Sliding-Window-Analysis

GitHub: zerodayhunter543/Defeating-Entropy-Smoothing-Advanced-Malware-Detection-with-Sliding-Window-Analysis

利用滑动窗口熵分析技术,精准检测通过填充零字节隐藏的高熵恶意代码,解决传统整体熵检测被绕过的问题。

Stars: 0 | Forks: 0

# 击败熵平滑——利用滑动窗口分析进行高级恶意软件检测 问题所在: 在我之前的研究中,我演示了如何利用香农熵(Shannon Entropy)来检测加壳或多态恶意软件。然而,老练的攻击者也深知这一点。他们使用一种名为“熵平滑”的技术——在加密后的恶意 Payload 中填充大量零字节(0x00),以降低文件的整体熵值,从而成功绕过基础的静态分析。 解决方案:滑动窗口熵 作为一名漏洞研究员,我不会只关注整个文件。我使用 Python 开发了一个滑动窗口分析引擎。该引擎不计算平均熵,而是将二进制文件分块(例如 256 字节的窗口)扫描,在文件上滑动以检测局部的加密峰值。 即使攻击者将 256 字节的多态 Shellcode 隐藏在 10MB 的零字节中,这个脚本也能找到异常存在的确切偏移量。 这对蓝队为何重要: 平均值会撒谎。通过实施局部峰值检测,我们将防御策略从容易被操纵的整体文件扫描转变为精确的、基于数学的威胁狩猎。 import math import os from collections import Counter # ========================================== # --- 高级恶意软件检测引擎 --- # 滑动窗口熵分析 # ========================================== def calculate_shannon_entropy(data_chunk: bytes) -> float: """ 计算特定字节块的香农熵。 公式: H(X) = - sum(P(x) * log2(P(x))) """ if not data_chunk: return 0.0 ``` entropy = 0.0 data_length = len(data_chunk) # Counter is highly efficient for byte frequency analysis byte_frequencies = Counter(data_chunk) for count in byte_frequencies.values(): probability = count / data_length entropy -= probability * math.log2(probability) return entropy ``` def sliding_window_analysis(file_data: bytes, window_size: int = 256, step_size: int = 64): """ 使用滑动窗口扫描文件以检测局部高熵峰值, 击败“熵平滑”攻击。 """ file_length = len(file_data) highest_entropy = 0.0 peak_offset = 0 ``` print(f"[*] Starting Sliding Window Analysis (Window: {window_size}B, Step: {step_size}B)...") # Slide the window across the byte array for offset in range(0, file_length - window_size + 1, step_size): window_chunk = file_data[offset : offset + window_size] current_entropy = calculate_shannon_entropy(window_chunk) # Record the highest entropy peak found if current_entropy > highest_entropy: highest_entropy = current_entropy peak_offset = offset return highest_entropy, peak_offset ``` # ========================================== # --- 模拟:攻击者 VS 蓝队 --- # ========================================== if __name__ == "__main__": ``` # 1. Attacker creates a payload (Highly Encrypted / Random - High Entropy) malicious_payload = os.urandom(256) # 2. Attacker uses "Entropy Smoothing" by wrapping the payload in massive junk data (Low Entropy) # They put 5000 bytes of zeros, then the payload, then another 5000 bytes of zeros. junk_data_start = b"\x00" * 5000 junk_data_end = b"\x00" * 5000 smoothed_malware_file = junk_data_start + malicious_payload + junk_data_end print("\n--- TRADITIONAL AV (WHOLE FILE ANALYSIS) ---") traditional_entropy = calculate_shannon_entropy(smoothed_malware_file) print(f"Total File Entropy: {traditional_entropy:.4f} / 8.0000") if traditional_entropy < 6.0: print("[-] VULNERABILITY: Traditional scan bypassed! File looks normal due to padding.") print("\n--- ADVANCED EDR (SLIDING WINDOW ANALYSIS) ---") peak_entropy, location = sliding_window_analysis(smoothed_malware_file, window_size=256, step_size=64) print(f"Peak Entropy Detected: {peak_entropy:.4f} / 8.0000") print(f"Anomaly Location (Offset): {location}") if peak_entropy > 7.2: print("[+] SUCCESS: Hidden polymorphic/encrypted payload detected despite zero-padding!") print("[+] ACTION: Isolate and alert the incident response team.") ```
标签:DNS 反向解析, DNS 解析, meg, Python, Waymore结果处理, 二进制分析, 云安全监控, 云安全运维, 信息安全, 加壳检测, 反向工程, 多态代码, 安全研发, 异常检测, 情报收集, 数据科学, 无后门, 沙农熵, 滑动窗口算法, 漏洞研究, 熵分析, 熵平滑绕过, 网络安全, 网络情报, 资源验证, 逆向工具, 隐私保护, 静态分析